Some examples:
Sexy: modest décollété
Cheap: Australian cleavage
Sexy: bikini
Cheap, Vulgar: microbikini
Sexy: short skirt
Cheap: skirt so short that you can't sit
Sexy: Daisy Dukes
Cheap: Cut-offs with hiney partially showing
Sexy: wearing a unexposed thong
Cheap: showing a whale tail
Sexy: t-shirt
Cheap, Tacky: t-shirt that reads "Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?"
Whether wearing a bra or not falls into one category or another is usually seen depending on whether there is a hint of the nonwearer's nipples or not. (Sorry for my crass candor here.)
A few years ago a Minneapolis company marketed a product called Bodyperks: these are nipple enhancers that could be placed under one's bra or worn directly on the breasts while not wearing a brassiere. In effect, nipple falsies! The web site below introduces the product, contains a number of testimonials from happy users, and illustrates how it might be used.
In the television program, Sex and the City, this was mentioned in one of the episodes as the Manhattanites strived to push the limits of sexiness as that bit of televised froth dramatically portrays.
http://www.bodyperks.com/
Appearing on any scene while wearing these Bodyperks would, to say the least, draw a considerable amount of attention! This is because the product gives the viewer the impression that the wearer is overperky and also somewhat sexually aroused as well. (Nipple erection can accompany sexual arousal or just plain being cold.) These Bodyperks are a specific instance of what Niko Tinbergen called supernormal stimuli: exaggerated versions of stimuli that normally produces a response, but becomes preferred to the normally-occuring stimulus.
In a real sense, if in the competition to seek mates (or at least to have one-night stands) more women employ such prosthetic means, then there will be pressure on the others to do likewise! This might, therefore, result in a breast-enhancement arms race!
In my opinion, this is way, way over the top. Far beyond tacky!
10 comments:
WTF! That's about all I can say on that!
Wow! They have more emphasis than the real deal. Not for me......
Incredible!
Who would wear these? If I want my nips showing I'll go stand in the frozen food section of the grocery store. :-)
(okay that was rhetorical)
I sometimes think it's not a bad thing that truth-in-packaging laws do not apply to the fair sex.
There's no substitute for the real thing.
This would be considered skanky in Minneapolis.
I can't beleive that is the companies only product. Must be a BIG seller.
The local sex shop has things like that for sale. One of my coworkers got a set and wears them to work. Really. The Research Park can be lively at times.
Really, how many women would actually wear a set in public?
Post a Comment